fixed a (critical) typo (#445)

I somehow had "smaller" for both the weak and strong cases -- not sure I let that slip through originally
This commit is contained in:
Christopher H.Barker, PhD 2017-11-01 16:37:43 -07:00 committed by Chris Angelico
parent 3ab7b4fa9e
commit 2aa8101ec1
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ there was no benefit to the method worth reducing the range of
functionality or adding the complexity of checking values to determine
the order of computation.
This leaves the boost "weak" test (2)-- or using the smaller value to
This leaves the boost "weak" test (2)-- or using the larger value to
scale the tolerance, or the Boost "strong" (3) test, which uses the
smaller of the values to scale the tolerance. For small tolerance,
they yield the same result, but this proposal uses the boost "weak"