PEP 704: Add a missing word in PEP withdrawal notice (#3111)
This commit is contained in:
parent
f223b5bd71
commit
30e586693c
|
@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ This PEP recommends that package installers like ``pip`` require a virtual envi
|
||||||
PEP Withdrawal
|
PEP Withdrawal
|
||||||
==============
|
==============
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
During discussion of this PEP, it became clear that changes to pip's UX are not controlled by PEPs as proposed. It also became clear that a significant number of users rely on being able to mix managed-pip dependencies with managed-by-some-other-tool dependencies (most prominently, when using Conda).
|
During discussion of this PEP, it became clear that changes to pip's UX are not controlled by PEPs as proposed. It also became clear that a significant number of users rely on being able to mix managed-by-pip dependencies with managed-by-some-other-tool dependencies (most prominently, when using Conda).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Further, a significant subset of the benefits of the proposed change are achievable via :pep:`668` (accepted and implemented at the time of writing). It provides redistributors of the Python interpreter control over whether users should be required to use a virtual environment, what the messaging presented to the user is and how the rollout of that change should happen for their users.
|
Further, a significant subset of the benefits of the proposed change are achievable via :pep:`668` (accepted and implemented at the time of writing). It provides redistributors of the Python interpreter control over whether users should be required to use a virtual environment, what the messaging presented to the user is and how the rollout of that change should happen for their users.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue