minor corrections
This commit is contained in:
parent
56a0b6d473
commit
69c9d49284
|
@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ including `this piece`_ on the various rejected forms.
|
||||||
http://www.python.org/doc/essays/ppt/euro2004/euro2004.pdf
|
http://www.python.org/doc/essays/ppt/euro2004/euro2004.pdf
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
.. _outlined his case:
|
.. _outlined his case:
|
||||||
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-August/authors.html
|
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-August/author.html
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
.. _this piece:
|
.. _this piece:
|
||||||
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-August/046672.html
|
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-August/046672.html
|
||||||
|
@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ class with and without decorators would be a readability problem.
|
||||||
Finally, adding or removing decorators would require reindenting the
|
Finally, adding or removing decorators would require reindenting the
|
||||||
entire function/method body.
|
entire function/method body.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Guido proposed and implementated a patch to support interpretation of
|
Guido proposed and implemented a patch to support interpretation of
|
||||||
a `list of decorators`_ as a prefix to function definitions ::
|
a `list of decorators`_ as a prefix to function definitions ::
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
[dec1, dec2, ...]
|
[dec1, dec2, ...]
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue