minor corrections
This commit is contained in:
parent
56a0b6d473
commit
69c9d49284
|
@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ including `this piece`_ on the various rejected forms.
|
|||
http://www.python.org/doc/essays/ppt/euro2004/euro2004.pdf
|
||||
|
||||
.. _outlined his case:
|
||||
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-August/authors.html
|
||||
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-August/author.html
|
||||
|
||||
.. _this piece:
|
||||
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-August/046672.html
|
||||
|
@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ class with and without decorators would be a readability problem.
|
|||
Finally, adding or removing decorators would require reindenting the
|
||||
entire function/method body.
|
||||
|
||||
Guido proposed and implementated a patch to support interpretation of
|
||||
Guido proposed and implemented a patch to support interpretation of
|
||||
a `list of decorators`_ as a prefix to function definitions ::
|
||||
|
||||
[dec1, dec2, ...]
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue