Specify where to send discussions for PEP 621 (#1447)
This commit is contained in:
parent
88a5ace0fb
commit
977f841a11
|
@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ Author: Brett Cannon <brett@python.org>,
|
|||
Sébastien Eustace <sebastien@eustace.io>,
|
||||
Thomas Kluyver <thomas@kluyver.me.uk>,
|
||||
Tzu-Ping Chung <uranusjr@gmail.com>
|
||||
Discussions-To: https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-621-storing-project-metadata-in-pyproject-toml/4513
|
||||
Status: Draft
|
||||
Type: Standards Track
|
||||
Content-Type: text/x-rst
|
||||
|
@ -646,7 +647,7 @@ waiting until the user has run a tool in the case of :pep:`508`'s DSL.
|
|||
Supporters also believe it is easier to read and reason (both in
|
||||
general and for first-time users). They also point out that other
|
||||
programming languages have adopted a format more like an exploded
|
||||
table thanks to their use standardized configuration formats (e.g.
|
||||
table thanks to their use of standardized configuration formats (e.g.
|
||||
`Rust <https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/reference/specifying-dependencies.html>`__,
|
||||
and `Dart <https://dart.dev/tools/pub/dependencies>`__). The thinking
|
||||
is that an exploded table format would be more familiar to people
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue