Fix typos.
This commit is contained in:
parent
07cbecb73b
commit
9f16d1c9d5
|
@ -15,14 +15,14 @@ Post-History: 30-Apr-2007
|
|||
Rejection Notice
|
||||
================
|
||||
|
||||
Rejectd based on Raymond Hettinger's sage advice [4]_:
|
||||
Rejected based on Raymond Hettinger's sage advice [4]_:
|
||||
|
||||
After looking at the source, I think this has almost zero chance
|
||||
for replacing list(). There is too much value in a simple C API,
|
||||
low space overhead for small lists, good performance is common use
|
||||
cases, and having performance that is easily understood. The
|
||||
BList implementation lacks these virtues and trades-off a little
|
||||
performance is common cases for much better performance in
|
||||
BList implementation lacks these virtues and it trades-off a little
|
||||
performance in common cases in for much better performance in
|
||||
uncommon cases. As a Py3.0 PEP, I think it can be rejected.
|
||||
|
||||
Depending on its success as a third-party module, it still has a
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue