Fix typos.
This commit is contained in:
parent
07cbecb73b
commit
9f16d1c9d5
|
@ -15,14 +15,14 @@ Post-History: 30-Apr-2007
|
||||||
Rejection Notice
|
Rejection Notice
|
||||||
================
|
================
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Rejectd based on Raymond Hettinger's sage advice [4]_:
|
Rejected based on Raymond Hettinger's sage advice [4]_:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
After looking at the source, I think this has almost zero chance
|
After looking at the source, I think this has almost zero chance
|
||||||
for replacing list(). There is too much value in a simple C API,
|
for replacing list(). There is too much value in a simple C API,
|
||||||
low space overhead for small lists, good performance is common use
|
low space overhead for small lists, good performance is common use
|
||||||
cases, and having performance that is easily understood. The
|
cases, and having performance that is easily understood. The
|
||||||
BList implementation lacks these virtues and trades-off a little
|
BList implementation lacks these virtues and it trades-off a little
|
||||||
performance is common cases for much better performance in
|
performance in common cases in for much better performance in
|
||||||
uncommon cases. As a Py3.0 PEP, I think it can be rejected.
|
uncommon cases. As a Py3.0 PEP, I think it can be rejected.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Depending on its success as a third-party module, it still has a
|
Depending on its success as a third-party module, it still has a
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue