The alternative builtin needed a better name.

pep-0322.txt

@@ -156,11 +156,12 @@ library and comments on why reverse iteration was necessary:
 Active Alternative
 ==================
 
-A simpler, but limited alternative is to create a builtin called
-reverse_range() that takes the same arguments as range() but returns a
-reverse iterator over the range.  The idea is that much of the benefit
-of inreverse() comes reducing the intellectual effort it takes to
-express the arguments for [x]range() when going backwards.
+A simpler, but limited alternative is to create a builtin that takes
+the same arguments as range() but returns a reverse iterator over the
+range.  The idea is that much of the benefit of inreverse() comes
+reducing the intellectual effort it takes to express the arguments for
+[x]range() when going backwards.  A good name is needed for this
+alternative -- revrange() is cleanest so far.
 
 
 Rejected Alternative