* Update pep-0008.txt
Clarified contradictions regarding comment formatting. NB Complete sentences should have a period.
* Update pep-0008.txt
Changed to remove reference to short comments without terminating period.
* Update pep-0008.txt
Further refined, corrected incorrect, fixed singular/plural.
* Update pep-0008.txt
* Update pep-0008.txt
Edit for consistency use 'multi-' in 'multi-line` 'multi-statement` 'multi-sentence` etc with dash rather than space or no splitter (eg 'multi line`, 'multiline`). If a different convention is preferred, do that.
* Update pep-0008.txt 'latin' capitalization
'Latin' is a proper noun, and thus should be capitalized.
* Update pep-0008.txt 'boolean' capitalization
Capitalization should be consisted. I propose 'boolean' should always be capitalized, as per https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/4481/should-the-word-boolean-be-capitalized
At present it is inconsistently capitalised.
Changed 'boolean' to 'Boolean'
* Update pep-0008.txt - 'unicode' capitalization
Update pep-0008.txt - as a proper noun, 'unicode' should be capitalized. Fixed 3 instances.
* Revise Update pep-0008.txt
Removed revisions to 'boolean', 'unicode'.
Unicode capitalization [issue](https://bugs.python.org/issue31873) under discussion.
* Removed trailing newlines
Removed trailing newlines
* Standardised 'multiline', reworded 'Latin'
Made the form 'multiline' uniform throughout the document.
Clarified references to Latin alphabet to direct to the specific character set desired.
* Removed errant period
* Moved 'alphabet'
Moved 'alphabet' before encoding parenthesis line 336.
PEP 3131 (Unicode identifiers) includes a policy section
covering their use within the standard library.
This adds an explicit cross-reference to that section from
the prescriptive naming conventions section of PEP 8.
Previous wording used the term "function annotations" which is overly generic. This commit modifies the wording to make it clear we don't mean arbitrary function annotations.
Patch by Brandon Rhodes provides clarity and rationale for this suggestion.
Also fixes the example to use "+", "-" operators which have same precedence
level.
Reviewed by Guido van Rossum.
conform the multiline-if statement conditionals to other recommendations in
the PEP, i.e. that lines in a multiline conditional end with the binary
operator.