```ruby
ChatSDK::Message.start_stream(message_id: 1, guardian: guardian)
ChatSDK::Message.stream(raw: "foo", message_id: 1, guardian: guardian)
ChatSDK::Message.stream(raw: "bar", message_id: 1, guardian: guardian)
ChatSDK::Message.stop_stream(message_id: 1, guardian: guardian)
```
Generally speaking only admins or owners of the message can interact with a message. Also note, Streaming to an existing message with a different user won't change the initial user of the message.
Why this change?
7.0.8.1 is a security release but the security issues do not affect us.
However, we are still bumping the Rails version since it doesn't take
much effort for us to do so.
Why this change?
Our tests are more stable these days and there is little to no need for
us to be retrying on PRs which helps to increase confidence in our test
suite since flaky tests are raised earlier.
This PR adds a new scheduled problem check that simply tries to connect to Twitter OAuth endpoint to check that it's working. It is using the default retry strategy of 2 retries 30 seconds apart.
Prior to this fix, if the last message of a thread had been made by a deleted user it would cause an exception as we would have no user to display, this commit uses a solution we have been using at other places: the null pattern, through the use of `Chat::NullUser.new`.
Plugins can now register this modifier:
```ruby
register_modifier(:chat_can_create_direct_message_channel) do |user, target_users|
# your logic which should return true or false
end
```
Prior to this fix the scroll was ignored when clicking the arrow bottom which would prevent the call to update last read. This fix manually calls update last read in this case and adds a test for it.
Why this change?
This regressed in 6e9fbb5bab because we
had a `request.xhr?` check before we decide to block requests. However,
there could not none-xhr requests which we need to block as well at the
end of each system test when `@@block_requests` is true.
This also reverts commit 6437f27f90.
In safe mode plugins are not loaded, so the plugin admin
routes are not loaded. This was causing errors in the
admin sidebar because we are trying to show links to the plugin
admin routes.
This fixes the issue by just not adding the plugin links if
we are in safe mode.
Now forums can enroll their sites to be showcased in the Discourse [Discover](https://discourse.org/discover) directory. Once they enable the site setting `include_in_discourse_discover` to enroll their forum the `CallDiscourseHub` job will ping the `api.discourse.org/api/discover/enroll` endpoint. Then the Discourse Hub will fetch the basic details from the forum and add it to the review queue. If the site is approved then the forum details will be displayed in the `/discover` page.
Also, remove experimental setting and simply use top_menu for feature detection
This means that when people eventually enable the hot top menu, there will
be topics in it
Co-authored-by: Alan Guo Xiang Tan <gxtan1990@gmail.com>
Why this change?
On CI, we have been seeing flaky system tests because ActiveRecord is
unable to checkout a connection. This patch is meant to help us debug
which thread is not returning the connection to the queue.
Example of timeout issue: https://github.com/discourse/discourse/actions/runs/8012541636/job/21888013082
Previously, problem checks were all added as either class methods or blocks in AdminDashboardData. Another set of class methods were used to add and run problem checks.
As of this PR, problem checks are promoted to first-class citizens. Each problem check receives their own class. This class of course contains the implementation for running the check, but also configuration items like retry strategies (for scheduled checks.)
In addition, the parent class ProblemCheck also serves as a registry for checks. For example we can get a list of all existing check classes through ProblemCheck.checks, or just the ones running on a schedule through ProblemCheck.scheduled.
After this refactor, the task of adding a new check is significantly simplified. You add a class that inherits ProblemCheck, you implement it, add a test, and you're good to go.
I was using adminPlugins instead of adminPlugins.index for the Installed Plugins
link in admin sidebar, which was causing Ember to highlight the main link and a plugin
link at the same time.
We only want to highlight the top level Installed Plugins link if we are on that page,
not if we are on e.g. the chat plugin admin route.
Why this change?
This reverts 725561cf4b as it did not
address the root cause of the problem even though it fixed the failing tests we were seeing
when running `bundle exec rspec --tag ~type:multisite --order random:776 spec/system/admin_customize_form_templates_spec.rb spec/system/admin_sidebar_navigation_spec.rb spec/system/admin_site_setting_search_spec.rb spec/system/composer/dont_feed_the_trolls_popup_spec.rb spec/system/composer/review_media_unless_trust_level_spec.rb spec/system/create_account_spec.rb spec/system/editing_sidebar_tags_navigation_spec.rb spec/system/email_change_spec.rb spec/system/emojis/emoji_deny_list_spec.rb spec/system/group_activity_spec.rb spec/system/hashtag_autocomplete_spec.rb spec/system/network_disconnected_spec.rb spec/system/post_menu_spec.rb spec/system/post_small_action_spec.rb spec/system/tags_intersection_spec.rb spec/system/topic_list_focus_spec.rb spec/system/topic_page_spec.rb spec/system/user_page/user_profile_info_panel_spec.rb spec/system/viewing_group_members_spec.rb spec/system/viewing_navigation_menu_preferences_spec.rb`.
The root cause here is that `before_action`s added to a controller is
order dependent. As such, some requests were not setting the cookie
because the `before_action` callback was not even hit as a prior
`before_action` callbacks has raised an error such as the `check_xhr`
`before_action` callback.
To resolve the problem, we need to add the `prepend: true` option in
our monkey patch of `ApplicationController` to ensure that the
`before_action` callback which we have added is always run first.
This change also makes a couple of changes:
1. Improve the response body when a request is blocked by the `BlockRequestsMiddleware` middleware
so that it makes debugging easier.
2. Only set the cookies for non-xhr HTML format requests. Setting it for
other formats is kind of pointless.
Subcategories were not returned when lazy loaded categories are enabled.
This commit implements the old behavior which displayed only top level
categories when there was no search term, but when there was one, it
searched subcategories too.
This commit also removes the client-side ordering of categories, because
the results are already ordered on the server-side.
Recently, Discourse introduced the concept of wrapper plugin outlets, which enables plugins and theme-components lo replace the wrapped content:
```
<PluginOutlet @name="wrapper-outlet-example" @outletArgs={{hash model=@model}}>
<div>Overridable content</div>
</PluginOutlet>
```
This commit adds automatic outlets that are placed `before` and `after wrapper plugin outlets. Connectors them can leverage these new automatic outlets to mount content at these positions, which greatly enhances the use case of the wrapper outlets.
These new auto outlets can be used in two ways:
- Using the standard folder base structure: the folder name that identifies the outlet in which the connector must be mounted must add the suffixes `__before`or `__after` to the outlet name. For the outlet in the example above, the connector should be placed into the `.../connectors/wrapper-outlet-example__before`or `.../connectors/wrapper-outlet-example__after`folders.
- Using API calls: this commit also introduces two new plugin APIs, `api.renderBeforeWrapperOutlet` and `renderAfterWrapperOutlet`. These new APIs can be used in the same way as `api.renderInOutlet`but will only work for wrapper outlets.
For the outlet above when using these new APIs alongside the gjs file format, one could define a component to be placed before the content of the outlet like:
```
api.renderBeforeWrapperOutlet('wrapper-outlet-example', <template>Hello from before the content</template>);
```
or after:
```
api.renderAfterWrapperOutlet('wrapper-outlet-example', <template>Hello from after the content</template>);
```
The uncategorized category was not rendered correctly and it was also
sometimes displayed twice. This commit is a similar bug fix to commit
76647d3a34 and is a follow up to commit
63a50b12fd.
If a user had `123456789` as username, it could be passed to the query as a number and the query would fail as it expects a string.
Also applies the same fix to groups.
Why this change?
We noticed that running `LOAD_PLUGINS=1 rspec --seed=38855 plugins/chat/spec/system/chat_new_message_spec.rb` locally
results in the system tests randomly failing. When we inspected the
request logs closely, we noticed that a `/presence/get` request from a
previous rspec example was being processed when a new rspec example is
already being run. We know it was from the previous rspec example
because inspecting the auth token showed the request using the auth
token of a user from the previous example. However, when a request using
an auth token from a previous example is used it ends up logging out the
same user on the server side because the user id in the cookie is the same
due to the use of `fab!`.
I did some research and there is apparently no way to wait until all
inflight requests by the browser has completed through capybara or
selenium. Therefore, we will add an identifier by attaching a cookie to all non-xhr requests so that
xhr requests which are triggered subsequently will contain the cookie in the request.
In the `BlockRequestsMiddleware` middleware, we will then reject any
requests when the value of the identifier in the cookie does not match the current rspec's example
location.
To see the problem locally, change `Auth::DefaultCurrentUserProvider.find_v1_auth_cookie` to the following:
```
def self.find_v1_auth_cookie(env)
return env[DECRYPTED_AUTH_COOKIE] if env.key?(DECRYPTED_AUTH_COOKIE)
env[DECRYPTED_AUTH_COOKIE] = begin
request = ActionDispatch::Request.new(env)
cookie = request.cookies[TOKEN_COOKIE]
# don't even initialize a cookie jar if we don't have a cookie at all
if cookie&.valid_encoding? && cookie.present?
puts "#{env["REQUEST_PATH"]} #{request.cookie_jar.encrypted[TOKEN_COOKIE]&.with_indifferent_access}"
request.cookie_jar.encrypted[TOKEN_COOKIE]&.with_indifferent_access
end
end
end
```
After which run the following command: `LOAD_PLUGINS=1 rspec --format documentation --seed=38855 plugins/chat/spec/system/chat_new_message_spec.rb`
It takes a few tries but the last spec should fail and you should see something like this:
```
assets/chunk.c16f6ba8b6824baa47ac.d41d8cd9.js {"token"=>"37d995a4b65395d3b343ec70fff915b4", "user_id"=>3382, "username"=>"bruce0", "trust_level"=>1, "issued_at"=>1708591735}
/assets/chunk.050148142e1d2dc992dd.d41d8cd9.js {"token"=>"37d995a4b65395d3b343ec70fff915b4", "user_id"=>3382, "username"=>"bruce0", "trust_level"=>1, "issued_at"=>1708591735}
/chat/api/channels/527/messages {"token"=>"37d995a4b65395d3b343ec70fff915b4", "user_id"=>3382, "username"=>"bruce0", "trust_level"=>1, "issued_at"=>1708591735}
/uploads/default/test_0/optimized/1X/_129430568242d1b7f853bb13ebea28b3f6af4e7_2_512x512.png {"token"=>"37d995a4b65395d3b343ec70fff915b4", "user_id"=>3382, "username"=>"bruce0", "trust_level"=>1, "issued_at"=>1708591735}
redirects to existing chat channel
redirects to chat channel if recipients param is missing (PENDING: Temporarily skipped with xit)
with multiple users
/favicon.ico {"token"=>"9a75c114c4d3401509a23d240f0a46d4", "user_id"=>3382, "username"=>"bruce0", "trust_level"=>1, "issued_at"=>1708591736}
/chat/new-message {"token"=>"9a75c114c4d3401509a23d240f0a46d4", "user_id"=>3382, "username"=>"bruce0", "trust_level"=>1, "issued_at"=>1708591736}
/presence/get {"token"=>"37d995a4b65395d3b343ec70fff915b4", "user_id"=>3382, "username"=>"bruce0", "trust_level"=>1, "issued_at"=>1708591735}
```
Note how the `/presence/get` request is using a token from the previous example.
Co-authored-by: David Taylor <david@taylorhq.com>
Why this change?
The previous test setup did not actually act as a regression test
because the test will still pass even when the fix is removed. This
commit uses a rendering test instead to ensure that Ember is tracking
the property change.
Why this change?
We have been getting customisation requests about adding stuff
before/after the sidebar sections so we are adding plugin outlets to
support those requests.
Joffrey JAFFEUX
David Taylor
Alan Guo Xiang Tan
dependabot[bot]
Ted Johansson
Vinoth Kannan
Isaac Janzen
Penar Musaraj
Kris
chapoi
Martin Brennan
Sam
Selase Krakani
Keegan George
Bianca Nenciu
Sérgio Saquetim
Blake Erickson