When the SAML authentication is not successful, we return a SAML
Response with a status that indicates a failure. This commit adds
an error message in the REST API response along with the SAML
Response XML string so that the caller of the API can identify
that this is an unsuccessful response without needing to parse the
XML.
`AsyncSearchActionTests` currently fails quite often. That is since the introduction of `RestSubmitAsyncSearchActionTests` which indirectly manipulates the channels being tracked in `RestCancellableNodeClient`. There are channels left in the map after `RestSubmitAsyncSearchActionTests` is run, and later `AsyncSearchActionTests` checks that there are no channels in the map which makes each test method fail. This is particularily hard to reproduce as the order in which tests are run appears to be platform dependent.
The test cluster assertion that there are no channels in the map only makes sense in the context of internal cluster tests, while there may be collisions with unit tests that register http channels as part of their testing.
This can be solved by renaming `AsyncSearchActionTests` to `AsyncSearchActionIT`. This way it won't be run as part of unit tests but rather within another JVM where the number of channels is `0` and such assumption holds, because there are no expected manual manipulation of the channels.
Relates to #54180
We previously checked for a 405 response, but on 7.x BWC tests may be hitting versions that don't
support the 405 response (returning 400 or 500), so be more lenient in those cases.
Relates to #54513
There is a setting in `ESClientYamlSuiteTestCase` under `usually()` that can install a `global`
template changing the number of shards for all indices. This can cause warnings when installing v2
templates (see #54367). This adds these as optional warnings so they don't cause failures regardless
of whether the global template is installed or not.
These warnings can be removed when our internal template usage has been moved to index templates v2
Relates to #53101
This is a follow up to a previous commit that renamed MetaData to
Metadata in all of the places. In that commit in master, we renamed
META_DATA to METADATA, but lost this on the backport. This commit
addresses that.
This is a simple naming change PR, to fix the fact that "metadata" is a
single English word, and for too long we have not followed general
naming conventions for it. We are also not consistent about it, for
example, METADATA instead of META_DATA if we were trying to be
consistent with MetaData (although METADATA is correct when considered
in the context of "metadata"). This was a simple find and replace across
the code base, only taking a few minutes to fix this naming issue
forever.
The anchor ID for the snapshot repository plugins section in the docs
was recently changes from `_repository_plugins` to
`snapshots-repository-plugins`.
This adds a corresponding redirect so no links are broken.
* Comprehensively test supported/unsupported field type:agg combinations (#52493)
This adds a test to AggregatorTestCase that allows us to programmatically
verify that an aggregator supports or does not support a particular
field type. It fetches the list of registered field type parsers,
creates a MappedFieldType from the parser and then attempts to run
a basic agg against the field.
A supplied list of supported VSTypes are then compared against the
output (success or exception) and suceeds or fails the test accordingly.
Co-Authored-By: Mark Tozzi <mark.tozzi@gmail.com>
* Skip fields that are not aggregatable
* Use newIndexSearcher() to avoid incompatible readers (#52723)
Lucene's `newSearcher()` can generate readers like ParallelCompositeReader
which we can't use. We need to instead use our helper `newIndexSearcher`
Remove mention of the `yellow` and `red` starting
health status from the rolling upgrade docs.
Instead, we should emphasize that users wait
for the node to recover with a health status of
`green` rather than the starting status.
Co-authored-by: James Rodewig <james.rodewig@elastic.co>
This PR:
1. Fixes the bug where a cardinality estimate of zero could cause
a 500 status
2. Adds tests for that scenario and a few others
3. Adds sensible estimates for the cases that were previously TODO
Backport of #54462
The docs here add nothing compared to those in the package. If anything
they are somewhat confusing since they don't give all necessary details to understand the snapshot process.
=> remove them and link to the complete docs at the package level
Bulk requests currently keep a reference to all bulk item requests until every one of them has
completed. There is no need to do so, however, and, in case of large bulks, can mean
unnecessary holding onto memory that might be better used elsewhere. More so as different
shard-level bulks can complete at different speeds, and one slow shard-level request should
not require holding onto every other shard-level request.
After commit #53661 converted the lang-expressions module to using
DoubleValuesSource, we've seen a performance regression for expressions
that use geopoints. Some investigation suggests that this may be due to
GeoLatitudeValueSource and GeoLongitudeValueSource wrapping their
per-document values in a DoubleValues.withDefault() class. Values exposed
via expressions already have a '0' default value, so this extra wrapping is
unnecessary, and is directly on the hot path. This commit removes the extra
wrapping.
This adds the ability for the IdP to define wildcard service
providers in a JSON file within the ES node's config directory.
If a request is made for a service provider that has not been
registered, then the set of wildcard services is consulted. If the
SP entity-id and ACS match one of the wildcard patterns, then a
dynamic service provider is defined from the associated mustache
template.
Backport of: #54148
Currently there is an issue with the InboundPipeline releasing bytes
earlier than appropriate. This can lead to the bytes being reused before
the message is handled. This commit fixes that issue and adds a test to
detect when it is occurring.
This commit clarifies the autoscaling feature flag registration system
property. The intention is that this system property is:
- unset in snapshot builds
- unset, true, or false in release builds
- in release builds, unset behaves the same as false
- therefore, we only register the enabled flag if the build is a
snapshot build, or the build is a release build and the system
property is set to true
This commit clarifies that intention, and removed a confusion situation
where the AUTOSCALING_FEATURE_FLAG_REGISTERED field would be set to
false in a snapshot build, even though we were going to register the
setting.
* EQL: Use In from QL
* EQL: Add more In tests
* EQL: Test In duplicates
* EQL: Add test for In mixed types
* EQL: Copy In translation to QL
* SQL: Use InComparisons from QL
* EQL: Remove boost checks from QueryFolderOkTests
* QL: Add TranslatorHandler.convert
* Add warnings/errors when V2 templates would match same indices… (#54367)
* Add warnings/errors when V2 templates would match same indices as V1
With the introduction of V2 index templates, we want to warn users that templates they put in place
might not take precedence (because v2 templates are going to "win"). This adds this validation at
`PUT` time for both V1 and V2 templates with the following rules:
** When creating or updating a V2 template
- If the v2 template would match indices for an existing v1 template or templates, provide a
warning (through the deprecation logging so it shows up to the client) as well as logging the
warning
The v2 warning looks like:
```
index template [my-v2-template] has index patterns [foo-*] matching patterns from existing older
templates [old-v1-template,match-all-template] with patterns (old-v1-template =>
[foo*],match-all-template => [*]); this template [my-v2-template] will take
precedence during new index creation
```
** When creating a V1 template
- If the v1 template is for index patterns of `"*"` and a v2 template exists, warn that the v2
template may take precedence
- If the v1 template is for index patterns other than all indices, and a v2 template exists that
would match, throw an error preventing creation of the v1 template
** When updating a V1 template (without changing its existing `index_patterns`!)
- If the v1 template is for index patterns that would match an existing v2 template, warn that the
v2 template may take precedence.
The v1 warning looks like:
```
template [my-v1-template] has index patterns [*] matching patterns from existing index templates
[existing-v2-template] with patterns (existing-v2-template => [foo*]); this template [my-v1-template] may be ignored in favor of an index template at index creation time
```
And the v1 error looks like:
```
template [my-v1-template] has index patterns [foo*] matching patterns from existing index templates
[existing-v2-template] with patterns (existing-v2-template => [f*]), use index templates (/_index_template) instead
```
Relates to #53101
* Remove v2 index and component templates when cleaning up tests
* Finish half-finished comment sentence
* Guard template removal and ignore for earlier versions of ES
Co-authored-by: Elastic Machine <elasticmachine@users.noreply.github.com>
* Also ignore 500 errors when clearing index template v2 templates
Co-authored-by: Elastic Machine <elasticmachine@users.noreply.github.com>
The allowTrial flag is always true, since trial licenses act as though
everything is licensed. This commit removes the allowTrial flag in
license checking helper methods.
This fixes a serialization bug in `auto_date_histogram` that comes up in
a cluster mixed between pre-7.3.0 and post-7.3.0.
Includes #54429 to keep 7.x looking like master for simpler backports.
Closes#54382
Pipeline aggregations like `stats_bucket`, `sum_bucket`, and
`percentiles_bucket` only operate on buckets that have multiple buckets.
This adds support for those aggregations to `geo_distance`, `ip_range`,
`auto_date_histogram`, and `rare_terms`.
This all happened because we used a marker interface to mark compatible
aggs, `MultiBucketAggregationBuilder` and it was fairly easy to forget
to implement the interface.
This replaces the marker interface with an abstract method in
`AggregationBuilder`, `bucketCardinality` which makes you return `NONE`,
`ONE`, or `MANY`. The `bucket` aggregations can check for `MANY`. At
this point `ONE` and `NONE` amount to about the same thing, but I
suspect that'll be a useful distinction when validating bucket sorts.
Closes#53215
This commit takes into account the index.number_of_replicas (defaults to
0 - no replicas- ) value when setting an index template. This change
enables the index.wait_for_active_shards value to be interpreted
correctly
(cherry picked from commit 07026ac3d56dc9fae69467adfda7eaed7ea3ca00)
Signed-off-by: Andrei Dan <andrei.dan@elastic.co>
Co-authored-by: tninokehoe <62655306+tninokehoe@users.noreply.github.com>
David Turner
Przemysław Witek
Ioannis Kakavas
Luca Cavanna
István Zoltán Szabó
Nhat Nguyen
Lee Hinman
Jason Tedor
James Rodewig
Lisa Cawley
Zachary Tong
Glen Smith
Jake Landis
David Roberts
Dimitris Athanasiou
David Kyle
Armin Braun
Andrei Stefan
Yannick Welsch
Dan Hermann
Alan Woodward
Tim Vernum
Tim Brooks
Ross Wolf
Ryan Ernst
Mark Tozzi
Nik Everett
Christoph Büscher
Andrei Dan