Removes `ViewEncapsulation.Native` which has been deprecated for several major versions.
BREAKING CHANGES:
* `ViewEncapsulation.Native` has been removed. Use `ViewEncapsulation.ShadowDom` instead. Existing
usages will be updated automatically by `ng update`.
PR Close#38882
`TNodeType.View` was created to support inline views. That feature did
not materialize and we have since removed the instructions for it, leave
an unneeded `TNodeType.View` which was still used in a very
inconsistent way. This change no longer created `TNodeType.View` (and
there will be a follow up chang to completely remove it.)
Also simplified the mental model so that `LView[HOST]`/`LView[T_HOST]`
always point to the insertion location of the `LView`.
PR Close#38707
Host `TNode` was passed into `getOrCreateTNode` just so that we can
compute weather or not we are a root node. This was needed because
`previousOrParentTNode` could have `TNode` from `TView` other then
current `TView`. This is confusing mental model. Previous change
ensured that `previousOrParentTNode` must always be part of `TView`,
which enabled this change to remove the unneeded argument.
PR Close#38707
`previousOrParentTNode` stores current `TNode`. Due to inconsistent
implementation the value stored would sometimes belong to the current
`TView` and sometimes to the parent. We have extra logic which accounts
for it. A better solution is to just ensure that `previousOrParentTNode`
always belongs to current `TNode`. This simplifies the mental model
and cleans up some code.
PR Close#38707
The `RefreshTransplantedView` flag is used to indicate that the view or one of its children
is transplanted and dirty, so it should still be refreshed as part of change detection.
This flag is set on the transplanted view itself as well setting a
counter on as its parents.
When a transplanted view is detached and still has this flag, it means
it got detached before it was refreshed. This can happen for "backwards
references" or transplanted views that are inserted at a location that
was already checked. In this case, we should decrement the parent
counters _and_ clear the flag on the detached view so it's not seen as
"transplanted" anymore (it is detached and has no parent counters to
adjust).
fixes#38619
PR Close#38768
When removal of one view causes removal of another one from the same
ViewContainerRef it triggers an error with views length calculation. This commit
fixes this bug by removing a view from the list of available views before invoking
actual view removal (which might be recursive and relies on the length of the list
of available views).
Fixes#38201.
PR Close#38317
This commit replaces an assert with more descriptive error message that is thrown in case `<ng-template>` or `<ng-container>` is used as host element for a Component.
Resolves#35240.
PR Close#35916
The ActiveIndexFlag is no longer needed because we no longer have "inline embedded views".
There is only one type of embedded view so we do not need complex tracking for
inline embedded views.
HAS_TRANSPLANTED_VIEWS now takes the place of the ACTIVE_INDEX slot as a
simple boolean rather than being a shifted flag inside the ACTIVE_INDEX bits.
PR Close#37073
Only refresh transplanted views at the insertion location in Ivy.
Previously, Ivy would check transplanted views at both the insertion and
declaration points. This is achieved by adding a marker to the insertion
tree when we encounter a transplanted view that needs to be refreshed at
its declaration. We use this marker as an extra indication that we still
need to descend and refresh those transplanted views at their insertion
locations even if the insertion view and/or its parents are not dirty.
This change fixes several issues:
* Transplanted views refreshed twice if both insertion and declaration
are dirty. This could be an error if the insertion component changes
result in data not being available to the transplanted view because it
is slated to be removed.
* CheckAlways transplanted views not refreshed if shielded by
non-dirty OnPush (fixes#35400)
* Transplanted views still refreshed when insertion tree is detached
(fixes#21324)
PR Close#35968
Currently destroy hooks are stored in memory as `[1, hook, 5, hook]` where
the numbers represent the index at which to find the context and `hook` is
the function to be invoked. This breaks down for `multi` providers,
because the value at the index will be an array of providers, resulting in
the hook being invoked with an array of all the multi provider values,
rather than the provider that was destroyed. In ViewEngine `ngOnDestroy`
wasn't being called for `multi` providers at all.
These changes fix the issue by changing the structure of the destroy hooks to `[1, hook, 5, [0, hook, 3, hook]]` where the indexes inside the inner array point to the provider inside of the multi provider array. Note that this is slightly different from the original design which called for the structure to be `[1, hook, 5, [hook, hook]`, because in the process of implementing it, I realized that we wouldn't get passing the correct context if only some of the `multi` providers have `ngOnDestroy` and others don't.
I've run the newly-added `view_destroy_hooks` benchmark against these changes and compared it to master. The difference seems to be insignificant (between 1% and 2% slower).
Fixes#35231.
PR Close#35840
- Adds `TView` into `LFrame`, read the `TView` from `LView` on `enterView`.
- Before this change the `TView` was ofter looked up from `LView` as `lView[TVIEW]`. This is suboptimal since reading from an Array, requires that the read checks array size before the read. This means that such a read has a much higher cost than reading from the property directly. By passing in the `TView` explicitly it makes the code more explicit and faster.
- Some rearrangements of arguments so that `TView` would come before `LView` for consistency.
PR Close#35069
Previously we would write to class/style as strings `element.className` and `element.style.cssText`. Turns out that approach is good for initial render but not good for updates. Updates using this approach are problematic because we have to check to see if there was an out of bound write to style and than perform reconciliation. This also requires the browser to bring up CSS parser which is expensive.
Another problem with old approach is that we had to queue the DOM writes and flush them twice. Once on element advance instruction and once in `hostBindings`. The double flushing is expensive but it also means that a directive can observe that styles are not yet written (they are written after directive executes.)
The new approach uses `element.classList.add/remove` and `element.style.setProperty/removeProperty` API for updates only (it continues to use `element.className` and `element.style.cssText` for initial render as it is cheaper.) The other change is that the styling changes are applied immediately (no queueing). This means that it is the instruction which computes priority. In some circumstances it may result in intermediate writes which are than overwritten with new value. (This should be rare)
Overall this change deletes most of the previous code and replaces it with new simplified implement. The simplification results in code savings.
PR Close#34804
The root view case is already covered by the existing code in the
getRenderParent function so no need to have an explicit checks
(and associated memory reads) again.
PR Close#33988
We already store a reference to a native host of a component
view so we can drop the getHostNative utility function (that
was getting the same reference from another data structure).
PR Close#33554
Prior to this commit, Ivy runtime asserted that a given element is an instance of a DOM node. These asserts may not be correct in case custom renderer is used, which operates objects with a shape different than DOM nodes. This commit updates the code to avoid the mentioned checks in case procedural renderer is used.
PR Close#33156
Fixes an issue where Ivy incorrectly inserts items in the beginning of an `ngFor`, if the `ngFor` is set on an `ng-container`. The issue comes from the fact that we choose the `ng-container` comment node as the anchor point before which to insert the content, however the node might be after any of the nodes inside the container. These changes switch to picking out the first node inside of the container instead.
PR Close#32324
This commit fixes a bug where ICU expressions inserted into ngTemplateOutlets
that are inside ngFor blocks would throw an error. We were assuming in view
insertion code that text nodes would always exist by the time a view\`s
creation block had executed. This is not true for text nodes created dynamically
by ICUs because this happens in the update block (in `i18nApply`).
This change ensures such dynamically created nodes are skipped when encountered
too early (as they will be attached later by i18n code anyway).
PR Close#31789
This commit is the final patch of the ivy styling algorithm refactor.
This patch swaps functionality from the old styling mechanism to the
new refactored code by changing the instruction code the compiler
generates and by pointing the runtime instruction code to the new
styling algorithm.
PR Close#30742
When `walkTNodeTree` was refactored, the case of ICU expressions was forgotten (because it was handled in the `else` previously).
This PR fixes that to handle it like `ElementContainer`.
FW-1411 #resolve
PR Close#31313
These files have not been formatted properly, due to issues in the
`gulp format*` tasks. See previous commits (or #31295) for more details.
PR Close#31295
When using `createEmbeddedView` after the creation of an ICU expression, the nodes for the current selected case were not reprojected (only the anchor comment node was moved to the new location).
Now we reproject correctly all the child nodes of an ICU expression when an anchor comment node is projected.
FW-1372 #resolve
PR Close#30979
When translated content was projected, all of the content was reappended, even the placeholders that had been removed in the translation.
To avoid that we added a new flag on `TNode` that specifies that a node is detached, in which case it should be ignored by the projection.
FW-1319 #resolve
PR Close#30783
Projecting bare ICU expressions failed because we would assume that component's content nodes would be projected later and doing so at that point would be wasteful. But ICU nodes are handled independently and should be inserted immediately because they will be ignored by projections.
FW-1348 #resolve
PR Close#30696
Stores the views that are part of a container directly on the `LContainer`, rather than maintaining a dedicated sub-array.
This PR resolves FW-1288.
PR Close#30179
