Previously we would write to class/style as strings `element.className` and `element.style.cssText`. Turns out that approach is good for initial render but not good for updates. Updates using this approach are problematic because we have to check to see if there was an out of bound write to style and than perform reconciliation. This also requires the browser to bring up CSS parser which is expensive.
Another problem with old approach is that we had to queue the DOM writes and flush them twice. Once on element advance instruction and once in `hostBindings`. The double flushing is expensive but it also means that a directive can observe that styles are not yet written (they are written after directive executes.)
The new approach uses `element.classList.add/remove` and `element.style.setProperty/removeProperty` API for updates only (it continues to use `element.className` and `element.style.cssText` for initial render as it is cheaper.) The other change is that the styling changes are applied immediately (no queueing). This means that it is the instruction which computes priority. In some circumstances it may result in intermediate writes which are than overwritten with new value. (This should be rare)
Overall this change deletes most of the previous code and replaces it with new simplified implement. The simplification results in code savings.
PR Close#34804
The root view case is already covered by the existing code in the
getRenderParent function so no need to have an explicit checks
(and associated memory reads) again.
PR Close#33988
We already store a reference to a native host of a component
view so we can drop the getHostNative utility function (that
was getting the same reference from another data structure).
PR Close#33554
Prior to this commit, Ivy runtime asserted that a given element is an instance of a DOM node. These asserts may not be correct in case custom renderer is used, which operates objects with a shape different than DOM nodes. This commit updates the code to avoid the mentioned checks in case procedural renderer is used.
PR Close#33156
Fixes an issue where Ivy incorrectly inserts items in the beginning of an `ngFor`, if the `ngFor` is set on an `ng-container`. The issue comes from the fact that we choose the `ng-container` comment node as the anchor point before which to insert the content, however the node might be after any of the nodes inside the container. These changes switch to picking out the first node inside of the container instead.
PR Close#32324
This commit fixes a bug where ICU expressions inserted into ngTemplateOutlets
that are inside ngFor blocks would throw an error. We were assuming in view
insertion code that text nodes would always exist by the time a view\`s
creation block had executed. This is not true for text nodes created dynamically
by ICUs because this happens in the update block (in `i18nApply`).
This change ensures such dynamically created nodes are skipped when encountered
too early (as they will be attached later by i18n code anyway).
PR Close#31789
This commit is the final patch of the ivy styling algorithm refactor.
This patch swaps functionality from the old styling mechanism to the
new refactored code by changing the instruction code the compiler
generates and by pointing the runtime instruction code to the new
styling algorithm.
PR Close#30742
When `walkTNodeTree` was refactored, the case of ICU expressions was forgotten (because it was handled in the `else` previously).
This PR fixes that to handle it like `ElementContainer`.
FW-1411 #resolve
PR Close#31313
These files have not been formatted properly, due to issues in the
`gulp format*` tasks. See previous commits (or #31295) for more details.
PR Close#31295
When using `createEmbeddedView` after the creation of an ICU expression, the nodes for the current selected case were not reprojected (only the anchor comment node was moved to the new location).
Now we reproject correctly all the child nodes of an ICU expression when an anchor comment node is projected.
FW-1372 #resolve
PR Close#30979
When translated content was projected, all of the content was reappended, even the placeholders that had been removed in the translation.
To avoid that we added a new flag on `TNode` that specifies that a node is detached, in which case it should be ignored by the projection.
FW-1319 #resolve
PR Close#30783
Projecting bare ICU expressions failed because we would assume that component's content nodes would be projected later and doing so at that point would be wasteful. But ICU nodes are handled independently and should be inserted immediately because they will be ignored by projections.
FW-1348 #resolve
PR Close#30696
Stores the views that are part of a container directly on the `LContainer`, rather than maintaining a dedicated sub-array.
This PR resolves FW-1288.
PR Close#30179
Currently we only reset the `Attached` flag of a view if it is detached through its parent, however this means that if a root view is destroyed, its flag will never be reset. This manifested itself in one of the Material tests where we were destroying the root view.
This PR resolves FW-1130.
PR Close#29064
Currently if a user accidentally calls ViewContainerRef.insert() with
a view that has already been attached, we do not clean up the references
properly, so we create a view tree with a cycle. This causes an infinite
loop when the view is destroyed.
This PR ensures that we fall back to ViewContainerRef.move() behavior
if we try to insert a view that is already attached. This fixes the
cycle and honors the user intention.
PR Close#29047
This commit removes code duplication around projectables nodes insertion.
It also simplfy the overall logic by using recursive function calls instead
of hand-unrolled stack (we can always optimise this part if needed).
PR Close#29008
For efficiency reasons we often put several different data types (`RNode`, `LView`, `LContainer`,
`StylingContext`) in same location in `LView`. This is because we don't want to pre-allocate
space
for it because the storage is sparse. This file contains utilities for dealing with such data
types.
How do we know what is stored at a given location in `LView`.
- `Array.isArray(value) === false` => `RNode` (The normal storage value)
- `Array.isArray(value) === true` => than the `value[0]` represents the wrapped value.
- `typeof value[TYPE] === 'object'` => `LView`
- This happens when we have a component at a given location
- `typeof value[TYPE] === 'number'` => `StylingContext`
- This happens when we have style/class binding at a given location.
- `typeof value[TYPE] === true` => `LContainer`
- This happens when we have `LContainer` binding at a given location.
NOTE: it is assumed that `Array.isArray` and `typeof` operations are very efficient.
PR Close#28947
Google3 detected circular references here, so splitting up this rather hodge-podge list of functions into slightly better organizational units.
PR Close#28382
- TView no longer stores childIndex
- LView now as CHILD_HEAD and CHILD_TAIL
TView used to store the head of the list, therefor all LViews had to have the same head, which is incorrect.
PR Close#28382
- Removes CONTAINER_INDEX
- LView[PARENT] now contains LContainer when necessary
- Removes now unused arguments to methods after refactor
PR Close#28382
Fixes the `ngOnDestroy` hook on a component or directive being called twice, if the type is also registered as a provider.
This PR resolves FW-1010.
PR Close#28470
Prior to this change we only checked whether current lView has a next pointer while traversing tNode tree. However in some cases this pointer can be undefined and we need to look up parents chain to find suitable next pointer. This commit adds the logic of searching for the next pointer taking parents chain into account.
PR Close#28533
