It makes sense that the lead technical writer should be allowed
to approve changes to DOCS: Marketing. The inspriration for this
change came to the current lead technical writer in a vision, or
perhaps it was a fugue state caused by too little caffeine. No
one knows. It's still a good idea though.
PR Close#37014
The legacy HTTP package was deprecated in v5 with the launch of
@angular/common/http. The legacy package hasn't been published
since v7, and will therefore not include a migration.
PR Close#27038
This change is part of a larger effort to migrate all golden type
tracking files to a single location. Additionally, this makes it
a bit easier to manage file ownership in pullapprove.
PR Close#36455
* Move tools/brotli-cli, tools/browsers, tools/components,
tools/ng_rollup_bundle, and modules/e2e_util to dev-infra/benchmarking
* Fix imports and references to moved folders and files
* Set up BUILD.bazel files for moved folders so they can be packaged with
dev-infra's :npm_package
PR Close#36434
Currently, if changes are made to `compiler-cli/ngcc` and to other
compiler-related files, then only the `fw-ngcc` group is requested
for review. This is because the `not contains_any_globs` condition
will be false for `fw-compiler` and the group will never become active.
We fix this by removing the incorrect condition and filtering out ngcc
files before checking `contains_any_globs` in the primary fw-compiler
condition.
PR Close#36661
Currently, when verifying our pullapprove configuration, we don't
respect modifications to the set of files in a condition.
e.g. It's not possible to do the following:
```
contains_any_globs(files.exclude(...), [
```
This prevents us from having codeowner groups which match a directory,
but want to filter out specific sub directories. For example, `fw-core`
matches all files in the core package. We want to exclude the schematics
from that glob. Usually we do this by another exclude condition.
This has a *significant* downside though. It means that fw-core will not
be requested if a PR changes schematic code, _and_ actual fw-core code.
To support these conditions, the pullapprove verification tool is
refactored, so that it no longer uses Regular expressions for parsing,
but rather evaluates the code through a dynamic function. This is
possible since the conditions are written in simple Python that can
be run in NodeJS too (with small modifications/transformations).
PR Close#36661
This commit update the PullApprove config to add AndrewKushnir to the `fw-testing` group. The reason for this change is that I was involved into TestBed rewrite (for Ivy) and it belongs to the `fw-testing` group ownership.
PR Close#36744
Moves the circular deps golden for packages into a subfolder of goldens,
`/goldens/circular-deps/` to more easily target the files for
ownership.
PR Close#36630
Prior to this change we manage a local version of commit message validation
in addition to the commit message validation tool contained in the ng-dev
tooling. By adding the ability to validate a range of commit messages
together, the remaining piece of commit message validation that is in the
local version is replicated.
We use both commands provided by the `ng-dev commit-message` tooling:
- pre-commit-validate: Set to automatically run on an git hook to validate
commits as they are created locally.
- validate-range: Run by CI for every PR, testing that all of the commits
added by the PR are valid when considered together. Ensuring that all
fixups are matched to another commit in the change.
PR Close#36172
Beginning with this change, global approvals will now require the approver
to include `Reviewed-for: global-approvers`, and a docs global approval
requires `Reviewed-for: global-docs-approvers`.
Historically, providing a review by any member of the global reviewer
groups would automatically be considered a global review. This change
enforces that global approval should be an intentional, explicit action.
The global-approvers and global-docs-approvers group will not be
requested as reviews by pullapprove.
PR Close#36384
The dev-infra pull approve group contained a condition with
the glob having a string concatenation rather than a comma
separated list. This corrects this error, and in another PR
we will correct the verification scripts failure to catch
this.
PR Close#36232
Sets up a golden file for the TypeScript circular dependencies for
source files inside of the `packages/` folder.
Also sets up the appropriate Yarn shorthand scripts, and a codeowner
group that is soley responsible for verifying changes to the golden.
PR Close#35647
Moves the public api .d.ts files from tools/public_api_guard to
goldens/public-api.
Additionally, provides a README in the goldens directory and a script
assist in testing the current state of the repo against the goldens as
well as a command for accepting all changes to the goldens in a single
command.
PR Close#35768
This script gets all of the current users for the organization and retrieves
information about PR/Issue contributions/authorship since a provided date.
Returning this information as a CSV.
PR Close#35834
Creates the scaffolding for an @angular/dev-infra-private package
which will not be published to npm but will be pushed to
https://github.com/angular/dev-infra-private-builds repo for each
commit to master.
The contents of this npm package will then be depended on via
package.json dependency for angular/angular angular/angular-cli and
angular/components.
PR Close#35862
* it's tricky to get out of the runfiles tree with `bazel test` as `BUILD_WORKSPACE_DIRECTORY` is not set but I employed a trick to read the `DO_NOT_BUILD_HERE` file that is one level up from `execroot` and that contains the workspace directory. This is experimental and if `bazel test //:test.debug` fails than `bazel run` is still guaranteed to work as `BUILD_WORKSPACE_DIRECTORY` will be set in that context
* test //integration:bazel_test and //integration:bazel-schematics_test exclusively
* run "exclusive" and "manual" bazel-in-bazel integration tests in their own CI job as they take 8m+ to execute
```
//integration:bazel-schematics_test PASSED in 317.2s
//integration:bazel_test PASSED in 167.8s
```
* Skip all integration tests that are now handled by angular_integration_test except the tests that are tracked for payload size; these are:
- cli-hello-world*
- hello_world__closure
* add & pin @babel deps as newer versions of babel break //packages/localize/src/tools/test:test
@babel/core dep had to be pinned to 7.6.4 or else //packages/localize/src/tools/test:test failed. Also //packages/localize uses @babel/generator, @babel/template, @babel/traverse & @babel/types so these deps were added to package.json as they were not being hoisted anymore from @babel/core transitive.
NB: integration/hello_world__systemjs_umd test must run with systemjs 0.20.0
NB: systemjs must be at 0.18.10 for legacy saucelabs job to pass
NB: With Bazel 2.0, the glob for the files to test `"integration/bazel/**"` is empty if integation/bazel is in .bazelignore. This glob worked under these conditions with 1.1.0. I did not bother testing with 1.2.x as not having integration/bazel in .bazelignore is correct.
PR Close#33927
Previously there was a regression in PullApprove which preventing draft mode
from being respected correctly for PullApprove processing. This regression
has been remedied and we should be able to once again respect draft mode for
PRs.
PR Close#35396
Previously we needed the `components-repo-ci` blocklist to disable
tests that were failing during the development of Ivy. Since we fixed
all those failing tests, and we don't want to regress, we can remove the
blocklist logic.
Resolves FW-1807
PR Close#35115
This condition is being removed as it currently is failing to work as
expected with pullapprove at the moment. The plan/expectation is that
after a bit of troubleshooting, we will be able to add in the condition
once more. Removing the condition actually returns us to the same
state we were in with CODEOWNERS in which draft PRs are also assigned
reviews.
PR Close#35012
We are migrating to PullApprove for our PR review management in an attempt
to allow for more granular and equitable code review assignments across the
team. Currently this migration is equivalent in the review assignments
it will create. Once stable, our expectation is that we will be able to
take advantage of PullApproves additional features for things like staged
reviews.
PR Close#34814
Summary of changes:
- created .github/CODEOWNERS with docs and config similar to the one in .pullapprove.yml
- updated docs
- updated .github/angular-robot.yml to not expect pullapprove status
- removed .pullapprove.yml
The primary motivations behind this change are:
- CODEOWNERS didn't exist when we introduced pullapprove
- CODEOWNERS is a functionality tightly integrated with github which results in better DX
- pullapprove v2 has been very unstable recently causing productivity loss
- pullapprove v2 has been deprecated in favor of v3, which requires and migration
PR Close#27690
these files are test data and note test infrastructure, so they don't belong to this group.
this means that the core group can now approve the golden symbol changes
PR Close#27004
With this update to permissions the docs team can easily identify the technical reviewer for a particular doc, which should streamline the reviews.
I also added Jennifer into all groups that contain docs, so that she can approve changes that contain only editorial changes.
Closes#21692
PR Close#25257