This updates the fix in commit eb70ea4.
Co-authored-by: Osama Sayegh <asooomaasoooma90@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Alan Guo Xiang Tan <gxtan1990@gmail.com>
Discourse has the Discourse Connect Provider protocol that makes it possible to
use a Discourse instance as an identity provider for external sites. As a
natural extension to this protocol, this PR adds a new feature that makes it
possible to use Discourse as a 2FA provider as well as an identity provider.
The rationale for this change is that it's very difficult to implement 2FA
support in a website and if you have multiple websites that need to have 2FA,
it's unrealistic to build and maintain a separate 2FA implementation for each
one. But with this change, you can piggyback on Discourse to take care of all
the 2FA details for you for as many sites as you wish.
To use Discourse as a 2FA provider, you'll need to follow this guide:
https://meta.discourse.org/t/-/32974. It walks you through what you need to
implement on your end/site and how to configure your Discourse instance. Once
you're done, there is only one additional thing you need to do which is to
include `require_2fa=true` in the payload that you send to Discourse.
When Discourse sees `require_2fa=true`, it'll prompt the user to confirm their
2FA using whatever methods they've enabled (TOTP or security keys), and once
they confirm they'll be redirected back to the return URL you've configured and
the payload will contain `confirmed_2fa=true`. If the user has no 2FA methods
enabled however, the payload will not contain `confirmed_2fa`, but it will
contain `no_2fa_methods=true`.
You'll need to be careful to re-run all the security checks and ensure the user
can still access the resource on your site after they return from Discourse.
This is very important because there's nothing that guarantees the user that
will come back from Discourse after they confirm 2FA is the same user that
you've redirected to Discourse.
Internal ticket: t62183.
* FEATURE: Let sites add a sitemap.xml file.
This PR adds the same features discourse-sitemap provides to core. Sitemaps are only added to the robots.txt file if the `enable_sitemap` setting is enabled and `login_required` disabled.
After merging discourse/discourse-sitemap#34, this change will take priority over the sitemap plugin because it will disable itself. We're also using the same sitemaps table, so our migration won't try to create it
again using `if_not_exists: true`.
This PR brings the `UppyUploadMixin` more into line with the `ComposerUppyUpload` mixin, by extending the `ExtendableUploader` . This also adds better tracking of and events for in progress uploads in the `UppyUploadMixin` for better UI interactions, and also opens up the use of `_useUploadPlugin` for the mixin, so anything implementing `UppyUploadMixin` can add extra uppy preprocessor plugins as needed.
This has been done as part of work on extracting uploads out of the chat composer. In future, we might be able to do the same for `ComposerUppyUpload`, getting rid of that mixin to standardise on `UppyUploadMixin` and have a separate `composer-uploads` component that lives alongside `composer-editor` like what we are doing in https://github.com/discourse/discourse-chat/pull/764
Previously we only supported a single 'required tag group' for a category. This commit allows admins to specify multiple required tag groups, each with their own minimum tag count.
A new category_required_tag_groups database table replaces the existing columns on the categories table. Data is automatically migrated.
Invited users were allowed to accept invites without entering a
password. When this happened, instead of receiving an activation email,
they received a password reset email. Basically, a user could postpone
choosing a password until after registration.
Unfortunately, this led to a confusing user experience and this commit
attempts to fix that by making the client require a password. There is
a single case when users do not need to input a password: when they sign
up using an external authenticator and password field is completely
hidden. In this case, the third party handles the password logic.
Technically, invites can still be redeemed without a password, but that
functionality was kept to preserve backwards compatibility.
Previous to this change if any of the assets were not allowed extensions
they would simply be silently ignored, this could lead to broken themes
that are very hard to debug
The changes are:
* Add an aria-label for the button that embeds/expand the replies of a
post below it
* Add an aria-label for the button that collapses the embedded replies
* Add an aria-label to describe the embedded replies section when
expanded and an aria-label for each embedded reply
The improvements are:
* Add an aria-label to the like/read count buttons below posts to
indicate what they mean and do.
* Add aria-pressed to the like/read count buttons to make it clear to screen
readers that these buttons are toggleable.
* Add an aria-label to the list of avatars that's shown when post likes
or readers are expanded so that screen reader users can understand what
the list of avatars means.
This commit introduces a new use_polymorphic_bookmarks site setting
that is default false and hidden, that will be used to help continuous
development of polymorphic bookmarks. This setting **should not** be
enabled anywhere in production yet, it is purely for local development.
This commit uses the setting to enable create/update/delete actions
for polymorphic bookmarks on the server and client side. The bookmark
interactions on topics/posts are all usable. Listing, searching,
sending bookmark reminders, and other edge cases will be handled
in subsequent PRs.
Comprehensive UI tests will be added in the final PR -- we already
have them for regular bookmarks, so it will just be a matter of
changing them to be for polymorphic bookmarks.
Tags (and tag groups) can be configured so that they can only be used in specific categories and (optionally) restrict topics in these categories to be able to add/use only these tags. These restrictions work as expected when a topic is created without going through the review queue; however, if the topic has to be reviewed by a moderator then these restrictions currently aren't checked before the topic is sent to the review queue, but they're checked later when a moderator tries to approve the topic. This is because if a user manages to submit a topic that doesn't meet the restrictions, moderators won't be able to approve and it'll be stuck in the review queue.
This PR prevents topics that don't meet the tags requirements from being sent to the review queue and shows the poster an error message that indicates which tags that cannot be used.
Internal ticket: t60562.
Clicking the Replies cell of a topic in a topics list shows a little
modal with 2 buttons that take you to the first and last posts of the
topic. This modal is currently completely inaccessible to
keyboard/screen reader users because it can't be reached using the
keyboard.
This commit improves the modal so that it traps focus when it's shown
and makes it possible to close the modal using the esc key.
Topics lists like /latest are ordered by last activity date by default,
but the order can be changed (and reversed) to something else such as
replies count and views count by clicking on the corresponding column
header in the topics list. These column headers are tabbable, but screen
readers announce them as, using the replies column as example, `Replies
toggle button`. This doesn't communicate very well that this the button
changes the order, so this commit adds `aria-label`s to all column
headers to make it clear that they change order. The current copy for
the `aria-label` is `Sort by replies`.
Previously, if an admin user tried to add/remove
users to another user's ignored list, it would
be added to their own ignore list because the
controller used current_user. Now for admins only
a source_user_id parameter can be passed through,
which will be used to ignore the target user for
that source user.
The user can select what happens with a bookamrk after it expires. New
option allow bookmark's reminder to be kept even after it has expired.
After a bookmark's reminder notification is created, the reminder date
will be highlighted in red until the user resets the reminder date.
User can do that using the new Clear Reminder button from the dropdown.
When creating files with create-multipart, if the file
size was somehow zero we were showing a very unhelpful
error message to the user. Now we show a nicer message,
and proactively don't call the API if we know the file
size is 0 bytes in JS, along with extra console logging
to help with debugging.
This change adds support for the categories endpoint to have an api
scope. Only adds GET scope for listing categories and for fetching a
single category.
See: https://meta.discourse.org/t/218080/4
This PR adds an extra description to the 2FA page when granting a user admin access. It also introduces a general system for adding customized descriptions that can be used by future actions.
(Follow-up to dd6ec65061)
This feature was rarely used, could be used for spamming users and was
impossible to add a context to why the user was notified of a topic. A
simple private messages that includes the link and personalized message
can be used instead.
This commit extends the original copy-codeblocks initializer,
renaming it to codeblock-buttons, and adding another button
to make the code block fullscreen in a modal window. The fullscreen
code is then run through highlight.js.
This commit also moves much of the code out of the initializer
and into a reusable CodeblockButtons class, so it can also be used
in the fullscreen code modal for the copy + paste button.
The fullscreen button will not be shown if there is no scroll overflow
in the code block, nor will it be shown on mobile. This commit also
changes the fullscreen table button to not show on mobile.
This will make long lines of code much easier to read and interact
with. This is gated behind the same `show_copy_button_on_codeblocks`
site setting.
* FEATURE: upload an avatar option for uploading avatars with selectable avatars
Allow staff or users at or above a trust level to upload avatars even when the site
has selectable avatars enabled.
Everyone can still pick from the list of avatars. The option to upload is shown
below the selectable avatar list.
refactored boolean site setting into an enum with the following values:
disabled: No selectable avatars enabled (default)
everyone: Show selectable avatars, and allow everyone to upload custom avatars
tl1: Show selectable avatars, but require tl1+ and staff to upload custom avatars
tl2: Show selectable avatars, but require tl2+ and staff to upload custom avatars
tl3: Show selectable avatars, but require tl3+ and staff to upload custom avatars
tl4: Show selectable avatars, but require tl4 and staff to upload custom avatars
staff: Show selectable avatars, but only allow staff to upload custom avatars
no_one: Show selectable avatars. No users can upload custom avatars
Co-authored-by: Régis Hanol <regis@hanol.fr>
Bianca Nenciu
Kris
Discourse Translator Bot
Joshua Rosenfeld
Isaac Janzen
Penar Musaraj
Osama Sayegh
Roman Rizzi
Jordan Vidrine
Martin Brennan
David Taylor
Dan Ungureanu
Andrei Prigorshnev
Sam
Alan Guo Xiang Tan
Mark VanLandingham
Ella E
maiki
Blake Erickson
Jeff Wong
Joffrey JAFFEUX