This new iteration of select-kit focuses on following best principales and disallowing mutations inside select-kit components. A best effort has been made to avoid breaking changes, however if you content was a flat array, eg: ["foo", "bar"] You will need to set valueProperty=null and nameProperty=null on the component.
Also almost every component should have an `onChange` handler now to decide what to do with the updated data. **select-kit will not mutate your data by itself anymore**
* DEV: Fix the function prototype observers deprecation
DEPRECATION: Function prototype extensions have been deprecated, please migrate from function(){}.observes('foo') to observer('foo', function() {}). [deprecation id: function-prototype-extensions.observes] See https://deprecations.emberjs.com/v3.x/#toc_function-prototype-extensions-observes for more details.
* DEV: Fix the function prototype event listeners deprecation
DEPRECATION: Function prototype extensions have been deprecated, please migrate from function(){}.on('foo') to on('foo', function() {}). [deprecation id: function-prototype-extensions.on] See https://deprecations.emberjs.com/v3.x/#toc_function-prototype-extensions-on for more details.
* DEV: Simplify `default as` imports
Co-authored-by: Joffrey JAFFEUX <j.jaffeux@gmail.com>
The bug was mentioned here: https://meta.discourse.org/t/poll-name/136436
I added specs to cover existing behaviour and refactored can_see_results method.
Guard condition should apply only if the poll result setting is set to `staff_only`.
In other cases, user can see results when the poll result setting is set to `always` or user voted or poll is closed.
A proper fix would involve it being precompiled like other assets, but
due to the conditional nature of the resource this is more complicated.
For now this is better than IE being broken.
When a user accepts an invite with an email address that matches a group
which automatically awards its members Trust Level 2, a race condition might happen
when the 'send_advanced_tutorial_message' job runs.
That job is enqueued inside the 'user_promoted' event which is triggered inside a
transaction on the user record. If the job runs before the transaction is done,
the user record is invisible and this generates an exception.
This commit mostly get rid of the later() call and encapsulate all pie chart display logic inside discourse-poll-pie-canvas widget instead of sharing it between discourse-poll-pie-chart and discourse-poll-pie-canvas
For various reasons, users may want to change their response to a poll.
Currently they have permission to do so, however it is hidden behind the 'Hide
results' button. Since what this button does is take the user back to the vote
panel, it seems more appropriate to name it 'Show vote', where it becomes
obvious that it can be modified and re-submitted.
As discussed here [1], there are mulitple users, myself included, who assumed
that editing a misclick response was impossible. This improves the label to make
it more descriptive of the action actually being taken.
[1] https://meta.discourse.org/t/ability-to-remove-my-choice-in-a-poll/53642/6
This PR aims to make poll results easily exportable to staff in a CSV format, so they can be analyzed in external software.
It also makes the export data easily customizable by allowing users to leverage any data explorer query to generate the report. By default, we use a query that ships with data explorer, but user can change the ID in settings or use 0 to disable this feature.
One potential upgrade is using the recent work that allows arbitrary group to run data explorer and allow all the groups with access to the configured query to also export polls, but that can be added later.
Co-Authored-By: Joffrey JAFFEUX <j.jaffeux@gmail.com>
Mark VanLandingham
David Taylor
Joffrey JAFFEUX
Bianca Nenciu
Dan Ungureanu
Neil Lalonde
Jarek Radosz
Arpit Jalan
Robin Ward
Krzysztof Kotlarek
romanrizzi
Gerhard Schlager
Rafael dos Santos Silva
Régis Hanol
Benjamin Hipple