The bug was mentioned here: https://meta.discourse.org/t/poll-name/136436
I added specs to cover existing behaviour and refactored can_see_results method.
Guard condition should apply only if the poll result setting is set to `staff_only`.
In other cases, user can see results when the poll result setting is set to `always` or user voted or poll is closed.
This commit mostly get rid of the later() call and encapsulate all pie chart display logic inside discourse-poll-pie-canvas widget instead of sharing it between discourse-poll-pie-chart and discourse-poll-pie-canvas
For various reasons, users may want to change their response to a poll.
Currently they have permission to do so, however it is hidden behind the 'Hide
results' button. Since what this button does is take the user back to the vote
panel, it seems more appropriate to name it 'Show vote', where it becomes
obvious that it can be modified and re-submitted.
As discussed here [1], there are mulitple users, myself included, who assumed
that editing a misclick response was impossible. This improves the label to make
it more descriptive of the action actually being taken.
[1] https://meta.discourse.org/t/ability-to-remove-my-choice-in-a-poll/53642/6
This PR aims to make poll results easily exportable to staff in a CSV format, so they can be analyzed in external software.
It also makes the export data easily customizable by allowing users to leverage any data explorer query to generate the report. By default, we use a query that ships with data explorer, but user can change the ID in settings or use 0 to disable this feature.
One potential upgrade is using the recent work that allows arbitrary group to run data explorer and allow all the groups with access to the configured query to also export polls, but that can be added later.
Co-Authored-By: Joffrey JAFFEUX <j.jaffeux@gmail.com>
* DEV: Provide radix 10 argument to parseInt
* DEV: Provide radix 16 argument to parseInt
* DEV: Remove unnecessary parseInt calls
* Fix year formatting
parseInt was used here to convert decimals to ints
Zeitwerk simplifies working with dependencies in dev and makes it easier reloading class chains.
We no longer need to use Rails "require_dependency" anywhere and instead can just use standard
Ruby patterns to require files.
This is a far reaching change and we expect some followups here.
* FEATURE: Staff only poll results
These changes allow only staff to see the results of a poll.
Non-staff users will be shown a screen like this:
1b8bd76013.png
The "Votes are public" message has been removed from the info section,
and the button to show the votes has been replaced with a message
stating the results will only be shown to staff.
* Update PR based on feedback
* Update plugins/poll/app/models/poll.rb
make sure we return a boolean
Co-Authored-By: Régis Hanol <regis@hanol.fr>
The migration script is not idempotent due to database constrains on the
poll related objects, namely:
polls: index_polls_on_post_id_and_name (post_id,name) UNIQUE
poll_options: index_poll_options_on_poll_id_and_digest (poll_id,digest) UNIQUE
poll_votes: index_poll_votes_on_poll_id_and_poll_option_id_and_user_id (poll_id,poll_option_id,user_id) UNIQUE
This change skips a particular poll migration if it's already found on
the db.
* Calling `Discourse.reset()` creates a new container
We should run our de-initializers only after acceptance tests,
since initializers are not run outside of acceptance tests anyway,
and the container at this point can be passed properly to the
`teardown()` method.
* Remove `Discourse.reset` from tests
This would cause a new container to be created which leaks many objects.
* `updateCurrentUser` is more accurate than `replaceCurrentUser`
* Remove long-deprecated method
* FIX: Memory Leaks when decorating posts
Previously we'd keep creating mixins dynamically when decorating the
same class.
This code changes the API to recommend an `id` parameter for each
decorator which will avoid leaks. All plugins should be updated to
include this parameter, although if they don't in the meantime it'll
just mean a warning in the console (and a continued leak.)
They were relying on a pristine message bus, however current implementation
still uses redis, stuff can get held up and we can end up publishing
distributed cache messages in the middle invalidating the tests
This reduces chances of errors where consumers of strings mutate inputs
and reduces memory usage of the app.
Test suite passes now, but there may be some stuff left, so we will run
a few sites on a branch prior to merging
Includes support for flags, reviewable users and queued posts, with REST API
backwards compatibility.
Co-Authored-By: romanrizzi <romanalejandro@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: jjaffeux <j.jaffeux@gmail.com>